55 Comments
User's avatar
fastpastor's avatar

This is the STUPIDEST thing I have read. How is driving individual cars more GREEN than a ski lift? With such a focus on individualism, no wonder this country is falling apart

Jeff Anderson's avatar

This was obviously satire.

Jeff Anderson's avatar

Really? You actually believe that this is written with earnest intent? WOW! 😄🤣😂🤣

Stuart Winchester's avatar

Maybe my favorite comment ever.

Paul Miller's avatar

Well, I believe they call it sarcasm.

PETER MALONE's avatar

Installing a Gondola on Little Cottonwood Canyon seems rather Disneyesque to me plus what would it have solved as you would have had to drive your car to a parking lot somewhere in Sandy, UT so it doesn't eliminate your car usage except for the last 5 miles on the access road. Hopefully, this idea will not re-emerge anytime soon.

EuphmanKB's avatar

Bwahahaha… missed this one. Replacing ski lifts with cars will be especially effective in avalanche conditions when the cars get an express ride to the bottom.

Pablo Naboso's avatar

I am so surprised to read this article and how it describes the fight between proponents of a gondola versus cars. The question which of the two is better is impossible to answer, because both solutions are bad.

In fact, downhill skiing is probably the most environment-unfriendly sport of all. The infrastructure needed (regardless whether it is a road+parking, or gondola skilift) is enormous and it requires destruction of the mountain forever. In addition, for the ski slopes you need to cut square miles of timber. Then there's the worst: snow cannons, which utilise enormous amount of water and often result in lowering of groundwater level. In essence, the downhill ski resorts should not be built at all, and if they are, it is due to pressure from gear manufacturers and the tourism ecosystem. There are however, many sport disciplines available (including back-country skiing) that do not require devastation of the environment, and still allow creating a tourism ecosystem - and they should be promoted.

I am sharing my European perspective here, I would be interested to hear how things are perceived differently in the US.

Rational Mystic's avatar

This is a stupid comment because ski resorts take up very little land in comparison to the immensity of the mountains, and all the water from snowmaking goes back into the environment when it melts in the spring

Rodney reid's avatar

Who in their right mind would want to sit in a vehicle for hours looking out the window at all the powder going to waste and then trying to find a space big enough to put their boots and skis on and try to figure out to get back once their at the bottom. A gondola is the better way the road would only benefit those sightseers during the summer.

Dave Bunch's avatar

April Fool! 🤣🤣🤣

Mayme's avatar

Any ecological problems could be solved with the disappearance of 75% of the world’s population. Line ‘em up and shoot’em.

Brian C.'s avatar

That was some crazy story. I had to check to see if I was reading an article from the Babylon Bee. 😂

Mark Gibbs's avatar

Sigh. An April Fool's day post that is neither clever or funny and wasted my time.

Mudhooks's avatar

My brother uses a wheelchair. It was very windy yesterday and he said he couldn’t come over because of the risk of getting blown away. I suggested getting a parachute to enable to take advantage of the wind.

He also paraskis, so this is definitely a great addition to the Paralympics. Para-paraskiing.

John's avatar

🤣. Were these folks dropped on the heads at birth? Oh, wait, a delayed April Fools joke. Still LOL.

Uncle Shamus's avatar

Giant helium balloons and helicopters would be great

David's avatar

This should really be a piece about how much opposition there is to buses, which I think are the solution. Gondolas surely are not the answer.